運用知見からエージェント型産業AIへ――IFS CTO ヴァイバヴ・クマー氏に聞く

From Operational Insight to Agentic Industrial AI - with Vaibhav Kumar of IFS

The AI in Business Podcast22分
運用知見からエージェント型産業AIへ――IFS CTO ヴァイバヴ・クマー氏に聞く

運用知見からエージェント型産業AIへ――IFS CTO ヴァイバヴ・クマー氏に聞く

The AI in Business Podcast

0:0022:55

要約

IFSのグローバルCTOであるVaibhav Kumar氏が、製造・エネルギー・公益事業などで進む熟練労働者の退職と知識流出、使いにくい業務システムという課題を語った回。会話型AIで入力・検索の摩擦を減らし、知見を活用できるようにするという考えを示した。エージェントの制御は人が握るべきだとし、データ基盤の整備とAIリテラシー向上が経営層の第一歩だと述べている。

この回のポイント

  • ●産業界の三大課題として、高齢化による技能・暗黙知の流出、計画外停止などの未解決の業務課題、地政学による供給網の混乱を挙げている。
  • ●業務ソフトの使いにくさが摩擦となり、熟練者は知識を入力せず、入力済みのデータも活用されていないと指摘している。
  • ●IFS Intelligenceは、ChatGPTやClaudeのような消費者向けAI体験を企業の業務文脈に重ねるものだと説明している。
  • ●エージェントは常に人が主導し、バックグラウンドで動かす場合も、いつ人を関与させるかを利用者が決められる設計だと述べている。
  • ●データが100%完璧である必要はなく、LLMで重複検出やクレンジングもできるため、意味のあるデータを持つシステムにAIを重ねるべきだとしている。
  • ●経営層から現場まで全員のAIリテラシーが重要で、対応しない企業はAIが当たり前になる段階で遅れると警告している。

章立て

  1. 産業界が直面する三つの圧力

    高齢化する労働力、計画外停止などの未解決課題、供給網の混乱という三つのマクロトレンドが語られる。

  2. 知識流出とソフトの摩擦

    熟練者は使いにくいシステムに入力せず、入力済みデータも活用されない問題と、AIによる解消の可能性を述べる。

  3. 現場向けAI体験とIFS Intelligence

    現場には用途特化で使いやすい体験が必要で、消費者向けAIの体験を業務文脈に重ねる考えを説明する。

  4. 人が制御するエージェント設計

    エージェントは人が主導し、バックグラウンド実行時に人を関与させるタイミングも利用者が決められると説明する。

  5. AI導入前のデータ基盤と選別

    基盤となるシステムの重要性、データ品質への向き合い方、MCP等の流行語に流されずAI製品を選ぶ姿勢を語る。

  6. AIリテラシーと乗り遅れのリスク

    クラウド普及期との類比で、経営層から現場までAIの基礎を学ぶ必要性と、将来AIが前提になるという見方を示す。

  7. 組織内の温度差と生産性向上

    経営層と中間管理職の温度差に触れ、AIは仕事を奪うのでなく生産性を高めるものだと述べる。CFOの質問の例も紹介。

解説記事

IFSのグローバルCTO、Vaibhav Kumar氏が、The AI in Business Podcastで産業分野のAI活用について語った。聞き手はEmerjのEysan Yazici氏。熟練労働者の退職に伴う知識の流出と、使いにくい業務システムに埋もれたデータという二つの問題を軸に、会話型AIが何を変えうるか、導入に向けて経営者が何をすべきかが議論された。なお本回はIFSがスポンサーであり、Kumar氏は同社の製品を前提に語っている点には留意したい。

産業界が直面する三つの圧力

Kumar氏は、製造、エネルギー、公益事業、航空などに共通するマクロトレンドを三つ挙げた。第一に労働力の高齢化である。熟練者が退職すると組織の暗黙知も一緒に失われ、世界的な技能不足を招いていると述べる。第二に、技術で解決できる可能性があるのに、企業が「そういうものだ」と受け入れてしまっている課題である。例として計画外停止を挙げ、航空や製造、石油・ガスでは実損や罰金につながると指摘した。第三に、地政学的な状況による供給網の混乱である。企業にはより柔軟で素早い意思決定が求められ、不十分なデータでの判断はリスクが高いという。

知識が使われない理由は「摩擦」

知識流出の背景としてKumar氏が強調したのは、企業向けソフトウェアの使いにくさである。データを入力する作業そのものが摩擦であり、周囲から尊敬される最も経験豊富な労働者ほど、その画面を使いたがらない。一方で、真面目に入力された情報も、画面操作が面倒で探しにくく意味づけも難しいため、活用されないまま眠っている。同氏は「知識を共有したくないのではなく、ソフトに対するいら立ちが大きいのだ」と説明する。AIによって消費者向け水準の体験を提供すれば、入力の摩擦が減り、蓄積済みのデータも新しく入る人材が使えるようになるというのが主張だ。具体例としては、技能不足でBoeingが整備要員不足により機体が地上に留まる事態を予測していると、同日の講演で触れられた話題を挙げている。入力しやすくすることと、知識を引き出しやすくすることの両方が揃えば好循環が生まれるとし、そうでなければ数百万ドル、場合によっては数十億ドル規模の損失になるとの見方を示した。

人が操縦するエージェント設計

現場向けには、役割に特化し、摩擦のないソフトが必要だとKumar氏は述べる。IFS Intelligenceは、ChatGPTやClaudeに慣れた体験を企業の業務文脈の上に重ねるもので、消費者向けの体験なら現場も使うはずだという考えが根底にある。規制の厳しい産業でのHuman-in-the-loop(人の関与)については、基本思想として「人がエージェントを制御する」ことを挙げた。エージェントは常に人が主導して動かし、バックグラウンドで動かすかどうかも利用者が選ぶ。その場合も、どの時点で自分を関与させるかを利用者が指定できる。人がエージェントを使いこなす力を高め、さらに進んで自らバックグラウンドエージェントを構築できるようにする、という設計である。

データ基盤と製品選別、そしてリテラシー

準備については、まず土台となるシステムが必要だとKumar氏は語る。IFS Intelligenceも、IFSのシステムが存在して初めて機能する。データ品質については、LLMが重複データの認識やクレンジングを助けられるため、「100%の品質になってからAIを載せる」必要はないという立場だ。その上で、どのAIを使い、何を使わないかを慎重に選ぶべきだと促した。業界ではバズワードが先行し、連携APIをMCPとして包んで売る動きが見られるが、汎用的で消費者水準の体験を実現できるかを見極めるべきだという。データ選定の考え方としては「データには重力がある」と述べ、会社の中で最も意味のあるデータを持つシステムにAIを重ねることを勧めた。

数か月内に取れる実践的な一歩として挙げたのが、AIリテラシーである。公的な議論から「AIは使えない」と誤解する人がいるが、イノベーションは主に下位レイヤーで起きており、業務アプリケーション層に入ってこそ価値が生まれると説明する。コンテキストとは何か、なぜ新しいスレッドを立てるのか、入力トークンと出力トークンの違いは何か、といった基礎を、エンジニアに限らず経営層から現場まで理解すべきだとした。2010年頃に新しかったクラウドが、数年後には経営幹部にも語られるようになった流れと同じ段階にあるという比喩も用いている。

組織内の温度差と「民主化」

どの業種が先行しているかを問われると、取締役会がCEOにAI戦略を求めるため、大企業から小企業まで検討は進んでいると答えた。ただし、経営層は意欲的でも、将来への不安や新技術への冷めた見方から、中間管理職には温度差があるという。これに対しKumar氏は、個人的な意見と断った上で、「AIが仕事を奪う」という物語が機会を損ねたと述べ、ChatGPTやClaudeのように仕事を代行するのでなく人を強力にするツールとして位置づけるべきだと語った。プレゼン資料作成を例に、詳細なプロンプトを書けば約15分で草案が出て、残りの時間で仕上げられるという自身の使い方を紹介している。

企業内での応用例としては、CFOの質問がVP、マネージャー、アナリストと伝言ゲームのように下りていき、Excel資料が戻るころには意図とずれる、という状況を描いた。CFOがAIに直接尋ねれば1分で答えが得られ、この知識と洞察の民主化が事業の生産性を大きく高めるとの見方だ。

まとめ

本回の核心は、AIを新しい自動化の道具として語るのでなく、使いにくい業務システムの摩擦を取り除き、退職で失われる知見と眠っているデータを活用する手段として位置づけた点にある。エージェントの制御権を人に置く設計思想や、データを完璧にしてからではなく、意味のあるデータを持つシステムから始めるという助言は、慎重な組織にとって実践的だろう。ただし、スポンサー企業のCTOによる発言であり、効果の数値的な裏付けは示されていない。日本でも熟練者の退職と技能継承は共通の課題であり、まずは経営層を含めたAIリテラシーの底上げと、自社で最も価値あるデータの所在の把握から着手するという示唆は参考になる。

文字起こし(英語・自動生成)

Welcome, everyone, to the Emerge AI in Business podcast. Today's guest is Vaibhav Kumar, Global Chief Technology Officer at IFAs. Vaibhav joins Emerge's Aishan Yaziki to discuss how industrial teams can capture and access operational knowledge as experienced workers retire. He explains how conversational AI could make business information easier to use while keeping people in control of agent action. Today's episode is sponsored by IFAs. In this episode, we cover how leaders can prepare their people and identify the business data needed to put AI to practical use. To go deeper on this topic and learn how leading organizations approach AI investment more like a venture portfolio and why interdisciplinary collaboration is critical to defining the right data for AI success, Download our free PDF report, beginning with AI, at emerge.com slash AIK1.

That's E-M-E-R-J dot com slash A-I-K-1 to download your copies. Now the conversation with Babel. Let's start from what you're seeing on the ground in effort-intensive industries, so like manufacturing, energy utilities. You have a background in energy as well. So these businesses have complex equipment and infrastructure that needs to keep running. So most often they have aging assets, they have supply constraints, they have regulatory demands. So where are teams feeling the greatest strain today, and how is that affecting day-to-day operations? So there's three macro trends that I see within all of these industries which are impacting each of these industries quite significantly.

The first is the fact that there's an aging workforce in these industries, which is going out of the door. And a lot of institutional knowledge goes out of the door with that, which is creating a massive skills shortage in these industries. And it's quite evident across the world. The second one, I would say, is the fact that there are some unsolved critical business outcomes or business challenges that these industries face, which technology has the promise to unlock, but companies have just come to reconcile with the fact that their operations will run like that. But there's a massive opportunity for business efficiency, which they're struggling to unlock completely. Think of things like unplanned downtime, which is a massive thing. If you're in aviation, if you're in manufacturing, if you're in oil and gas, all of those, that costs real money and can get you fines and whatnot,

if you're critical manufacturing or aviation or whatever. And then the third one I would say is that given the geopolitical climate, it, there's a lot of disruption to supply chains, which means companies now have to start to become even more flexible and adaptable, right, as these things happen, which is again putting a strain on companies' ability to move fast, make quick decisions, change, and then, you know, decisions made with half the data, of course, you know, can be super risky, right, and cost you money. And tell me a little bit about the workforce from the conversations, you know, You mentioned before that work for some of this critical knowledge, you know, living within the workforce, which is now leaving at its peak. So tell me a little bit about the problems with that. The reality is, I mean, when you have people that have spent so much time in your company and they build institutional knowledge is latent. And the problem that you've had with software for the longest time, enterprise software is it's just super inconvenient to go in and get data into the system.

right? So it's a friction, right? It's a point of friction. Using that software is a point of friction for your most experienced worker who is well respected by everybody else. So they don't, right? Conversely, the people who are diligent and that do maneuver these screens and go into that data, that data is just sat there but not being used. So you have heaps of potential knowledge that you're just not using because, again, these screens are a friction for you to operate and be able to find that data and make sense of it. That's what AI has the ability to unlock. AI has the ability to build super consumer-grade experiences that allow you in a frictionless manner to... It's not that people don't want to share their knowledge. It's just people are frustrated. The frustration that you experience when you use bad software is super high. So AI has the ability to build consumer-grade experiences, which takes that friction away.

Equally, it has the ability to actually unlock all of that latent data and the knowledge that sits within there for your incoming workforce. And from your own experience, could you walk us through what happens when one of these challenges turn into an actual disruption, maybe, with an example? I mean like the example that Mark gave this morning is a nice one right Like Boeing is basically predicting that because of the skills shortage it going to have planes on the ground because there nobody there to maintain those planes So like you know I think there's probably enough of these kind of micro-level examples in different countries and different industries, right? And definitely these micro-examples in different specific companies itself, right? Where because of that skills shortage, your operations come to a halt. And so you need to make it

more convenient for them to enter that data into the system. And if you can do both these things, you create a flywheel. And that costs you millions, if not billions. Perfect. That's helpful. And maybe let's get into what AI is changing here. It was a big part of today's conversations as well, having insight into what's happening is one thing, but also understanding what to do and getting it done is a completely different beast. So how is AI helping industrial teams close that gap and which capabilities are maybe making the biggest practical difference for like difference on the front line, basically? See, at the end of the day, what the frontline worker requires is very purpose-built, persona-specific experiences that they can put to use in a frictionless manner, right? So they require software that is just easy to use, right?

You look at IFS intelligence, right? That is an example of effectively bringing consumer-grade AI experiences into an enterprise setting, right? It's the same experience that you're familiar with Claw or ChatGPG. Now you're layering that on top of an enterprise business context. That's the power, right? So all of the products that we're building for the front line are products that are very much grounded in a consumer-grade experience because our belief is you give them a consumer-grade experience and they will use it because they're very used to using those consumers, right? Don't make it complex like enterprise software is. And tell me a little bit about how do we keep human in the loop in that process? Because going back to the first question as well, you know, there are a lot of regulatory aspects of these conversations. So within these different processes, how do you decide what AI can handle on its own and where a person needs to basically stay involved?

for the fundamentals of when we build software we want to leave the human in control of the agent which means the human drives the agent so if we showed you in stage 2 years with intelligence it's the human that always drives the agent it's only by a human's choice do you decide well actually I want agents to just work in the background for me and when you do decide that you're then given the option and the ability to say, okay, when do you bring me in the loop, right? So you can decide those things. So by design, what we're doing is we're building the capability for humans to harness agents. And we're also giving the humans to go further and say, okay, I want to build background agents. So it's always about keeping the human in the loop and keeping the human in control. That's perfect. And let's make maybe this a little bit more practical for leaders listening today and this episode as well.

So for folks who are listening, for leaders who are listening and thinking, how do we get our organizations ready for this? Where would you start? So are these workflows become more intelligent and autonomous? What needs to be in place across their data, maybe their workforce and the way they oversee AI's decisions? you cannot underestimate the importance of foundations before you can get AI to work so like with what we did with intelligence intelligence only works because you have a foundation of IFS systems in your landscape so having the foundation is super duper important, now the data is important now aspects like data quality and data cleansing that actually get helped when you put agents over the top because at the end of the day, the power that you have within the LLM today can actually recognize duplicate data, can help you cleanse that data. So I don't think you have to be fearful of the fact that my data needs to be 100% quality

before I apply AI or put AI over the top of it. But you need to have systems with data. That's number one. Number two is you need to be choosy and very, very deliberate about which AI you use and which AI you don't. In the world of technology, there has been buzzword bingo for the longest time, right? So you see everybody package their integration APIs into MCPs and sell you MCPs, right? But you have to think about, you know, meaningfully, what are the products and capabilities that are able to actually give you the generalizable consumer-grade AI experience versus not, right? So it's both about the foundations of the data and then being very deliberate about which AI products you choose and what capabilities they give. Yeah. And that data readiness that we're talking about here, when is that data incomplete and how do you decide whether it reliable enough to act on with your customers or your clients I think incomplete or not putting AI over the top of it is useful Okay And the way I think about it is data has gravity right

So where is the gravitational pull? Which systems have the most meaningful data in your company, right? Go and think meaningfully about how you can put AI over the top of that, and you'll start to see good things happen. Interesting. And if the leaders could just take one practical step in in the next few months, what would you recommend as they are preparing their organizations for the shift that's happening right now? I think the most important is the literacy of people with the capability that AI has today. there is a lot of because of the public discourse around AI there is a lot of people that misinterpret that public discourse to say well AI is not capable that's not the point the point is what you're seeing is you're seeing a lot of innovation in AI that has happened in the lower layers of the stack and true value for a business is created when that AI starts to get into the application layer

and the enterprise software layer that's what companies like us are doing now But that's not been the case and isn't the case today across the board. So the more you see that happen, the more this narrative and the public discourse will change. But just because you don't see that happen today or not enough of it doesn't mean AI is not capable. So the best thing the leaders can do right now is to prepare their people to be capable and literate of understanding AI. and that doesn't just mean your engineers and your doers. That means everybody, top down. I think there's a big opportunity for leaders to set the right example. Just using the consumer-grade tools like Cloud and ChatGPT requires a level of knowledge. What does context mean? Why do I need to start new threads or a new chat, as some would call it? What is the skill? And how does a skill get used?

These are the difference between an output and an input token. These are the kind of basics, like super fundamentals, that everybody should be literate about. You're telling me basically getting, understanding what's happening is the core piece of how we need to get ready for the stuff that's happening in the industry. And that includes everybody from boardroom to frontline workers. It's the same thing that happened with cloud, right? Cloud was this new entity in 2010, right? and by the time you went into 2015, 2018, even the executives were able to articulately talk about cloud and hyperscalers and regional redundancy and all of these concepts, right? And I think that's the phase that we're in right now. We need to be super attentive, right? Building the awareness is the first step to understanding how you can apply this technology and where you would apply it. Is this one of the things that you would say if overlooked, it would be a hard thing to fix later,

or is there anything else that you... You will lose out. You will lose out. I mean, at the end of the day, technology, innovation, once it sticks, it becomes the next layer on top, right? That's what you're seeing. AI is the layer on top of, particularly in the enterprise context, AI is now the layer on top of your enterprise systems. If you don't get involved and don't deliberately look at how you can apply AI to your enterprise software, you're going to lose out because that is going to become the norm in terms of what your users expect. And that is going to become the norm in terms of the type of business productivity and business outcomes that you can achieve. That's going to become a point of differentiation and in the years to come, it'll just become a point of being in the competition. It'll become table stakes. And from all the different verticals that we were talking this morning, in these different keynotes, energy, utilities, manufacturing and whatnot. Which of these verticals do you see are making the headway when it comes to adaptation?

That's an interesting question. I think the reality is because this wave of AI is so prominent and so popular, I think that every board is telling every CEO to drive an AI strategy, right? So I'm seeing it from the big companies to the small, from the manufacturers to the utilities to the airlines. everybody is figuring out what their AI strategy is. So I think the propensity to change is there. There's actually a panel that we do tomorrow morning which you can come to. The purpose of it is literally to try and distinguish between what are breaks that people may be applying erroneously versus what are actual safeguards that you need to consider when you build AI for critical industries like we serve. And I think that's the reality of what's going on. right? There's leaders who want to figure out an AI strategy, but you have middle management who are not incentivized to actually be, you know, interested and involved around understanding the AI capability and in the

earnest applying it because perhaps they're scared for their future, right? Or other things, right? Maybe they're just, like, you also become a bit cynical about new technology as you grow older, right? So for all of those reasons, there is a massive dichotomy that's happening within the organization at this moment in time and there is a conviction that the enterprise world is going to find soon enough when enterprise software with native AI capability becomes a norm they just going to have to invest in this right And that's why I say that right now, the first movers who invest into this in the US, that will be a point of differentiation for businesses. And soon enough, it will just become table stakes. Yeah. And now, nowadays, everything, even a month, makes a big difference. And you mentioned a disconnection. Like we were talking about AI, you know, taking people's jobs. And now you're also telling me there is a disconnection between, you know, C-level management, metal management, and possibly the workers and frontline workers as well.

So how do you see some of your clients, customers overcoming this? And we talked about like getting ready for AI, but educating ourselves and whatnot. not how do we overcome this connection between the different levels of management and their incentives applying AI across their workflows and organizations? There's a lot to be done around human-centered AI, right? Like this narrative that took shape within the industry, and this is my personal opinion, of course, and this narrative that took shape within the industry that, you know, AI is going to take all your jobs, which is so hyped, right, for a whole year. and then you actually go into actually the amount of jobs are increasing rather than reducing. It has kind of poisoned, let's say, the opportunity with AI. And I think the experiences that you have in the consumer world or even like the productivity tools that you use in your business day to day, right? So you use ChatGPT or Claude. Like none of that actually claims to do your job. It makes you super powerful.

what took you maybe three hours to do, you're now doing in minutes, right? Like before, if you had a PowerPoint that you wanted to create, right? If you're an executive and you wanted to create a presentation, that's a three-day job. Build a storyboard, create the slides, you know, maybe form it out to someone else and then review meetings and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Now, you still need to do the work. You still need to be the creator of it, right? So you need to, and I do it when I want to create presentations, right? I'll write very, very long prompts, right? I describe exactly the detail and the intent of what I want. But then you feed it into Cloud, and out comes a presentation within 15 minutes, which then you can spend the next maybe half an hour, 40 minutes, you know, perfecting, and suddenly you have it, right? That's superpowers, right? So that's exactly what we are trying to do with IFS Intelligence on top of your enterprise data. You bring that consumer-grade capability into the enterprise context,

and you start to democratize the access that people have. Like today, if your CFO wants to ask a question, your CFO asks the question who never, ever goes into the system where the data lives. So he just asks the question, and then the VP has to go and answer that, and the VP never lives in that system. So the VP asks the manager. The manager probably doesn't know how to maneuver the screen, so the manager gives it to an analyst. and by the time that Chinese whisper reaches the analyst, the analyst probably doesn't understand exactly what the CFO was asking. Analyst pulls out something in Excel and then perhaps uses a plot to build a nice presentation that goes back up the chain. CFO goes, I don't know what you were listening to or not, but there's not what I wanted. Now change this, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Versus a CFO just going into intelligence and saying, I want to know this, and within a minute. So that democratizing of knowledge, of insight, through a consumer-grade AI layer that sits on top of your enterprise software, I think is a game-changing capability which will make businesses super productive.

And you just need to make sure all of your employees, all of your organizations, members understand that to fix that disconnect. And now everybody has an incentive to make it work, to implement it. Exactly. Perfect. Okay, great. So I'll thank you so much for your time, Wade. I think we are done. Perfect. This was very enjoyable. Just in time. Just in time, exactly. Wrapping up today's episode, let's look at the three key takeaways from our conversation with Vaba. First, examine both sides of the knowledge gap, how experienced workers record what they know, and how other employees find and use information already stored in business systems. Second, define which actions people direct and when agents working in the background must bring a person into the process. And finally, identify the systems containing your most meaningful business data

and built AI literacy across the organization, including executives and frontline employees. In this episode, we covered how leaders can prepare their people and identify the business data needed to put AI to practical use. To go deeper on this topic and learn how leading organizations approach AI investment more like a venture portfolio and why interdisciplinary collaboration is critical to defining the right data for AI success, download our pre-PDF report beginning with AI at emerge.com slash AIK1. That's emerj.com slash AIK1 to download your copy. For further executive level analysis and to join our network of leaders delivering workflow impact with AI, visit Emerge.com. On behalf of the team Emerge, we'll see you on the next episode.

番組の概要欄(原文)

Retiring workers can take operational knowledge with them, while difficult-to-use enterprise systems leave other information underused. In this episode, Vaibhav Kumar, Global Chief Technology Officer at IFS, joins Emerj's Eysan Yazici to examine how conversational AI could help industrial teams capture knowledge and access business information more directly. He discusses reducing friction in enterprise software, letting users determine when agents require human involvement, and building AI literacy around systems containing meaningful business data.   This episode is sponsored by IFS.   Learn how leading organizations approach AI investment more like a venture portfolio, and why interdisciplinary collaboration is critical to defining the right data for AI success. Download our free PDF report, "Beginning with AI," at emerj.com/aik1

出典・この記事について

番組
The AI in Business Podcast(Daniel Faggella)
元の回
From Operational Insight to Agentic Industrial AI - with Vaibhav Kumar of IFS
配信日
要約作成日
公式サイト
emerj.com

この要約・解説記事は、元の音声を文字起こしした内容をもとに AI(Claude)が日本語で作成したものです。 固有名詞や数値に誤りを含む場合があるため、正確な内容は元の音声でご確認ください。制作方法について

X でシェア

関連エピソード