

Claude Duet は美しい。それでも私は使うのを忘れた
How I AI
要約
Claire Vo が、Anthropic の新しいパーソナルエージェント「Claude Duet」を早期アクセスで試した第一印象を語る回。オンボーディングやタスクリスト、アーティファクト、チャンネルなど設計の完成度は高く評価する一方、プロアクティブさの不足、応答の遅さ、デスクトップ版やマルチプレイヤー対応の欠如を課題に挙げた。デザインや性能だけでは、数多くのエージェントの中で注目を集められないという見方を示している。
この回のポイント
- ●Claude Duet は iPhone/Android 向けのパーソナルエージェントで、Claude のプラグインやコネクタを引き継ぎ、中小企業オーナーや多忙なビジネスパーソンを対象としている。
- ●オンボーディングは何ができ何にアクセスするかが明確で、Claire は「角がない」ほど磨かれたデザインだと評価している。
- ●タスクリスト、ファーストクラスのアーティファクト、Slack に着想を得たチャンネルが、エージェントの基本要素として機能している。
- ●「プロアクティブ」とされるのに初期設定後はほとんど通知が来ず、再利用のきっかけにならなかった。朝のブリーフィングだけでは再訪の動機として弱いとも述べている。
- ●応答が遅く、タスクが10分以上かかることもあり、ループが閉じず存在を忘れてしまった。Muse や Codex の速さと対比している。
- ●デスクトップアプリ非対応、ローカルスキルの非取り込み、チーム共有の弱さが、日常の作業環境に入りにくい理由として挙げられた。
章立て
エージェント疲れと Duet の概要
新しいパーソナルエージェントに疲れている中で、Claude Duet が突出できるかを検証する趣旨を説明。対象ユーザーや機能の概要も紹介する。
際立つデザインの完成度
オンボーディングの丁寧さと、Muse に近いプリミティブを備えつつ洗練されている点を評価している。
タスクリスト・アーティファクト・チャンネル
タスク管理、既存アーティファクトの読み込み、Slack 風チャンネルによる整理を紹介。アイコンも好意的に評価。
プロアクティブさの不足
初期設定後ほぼ通知がなく、再訪を促されなかった点を指摘。朝のブリーフィング以外の再エンゲージ手段が必要だと論じる。
遅さと実タスクの結果
メールや Slack の整理、Warriors チケット探しを試し、遅延のせいで作業が完了せず忘れてしまった経験を語る。
デスクトップ版の欠如
日中の仕事ではスマホ中心では使いにくく、他のエージェントはデスクトップに常駐していると比較する。
営業・スライド・動画の検証
営業パイプラインの分析は良好、Google ドキュメントのデッキは及第点。ローカルスキルが使えず動画作成はできなかった。
シングルプレイヤーの限界と最終評価
チームでエージェントを共有できない点を課題に挙げ、完成度は高いが仕上げが必要と総括する。
解説記事
AIエージェントが乱立するなか、Anthropic が発表した新しいパーソナルエージェント「Claude Duet」を、ポッドキャスト「How I AI」のホスト Claire Vo が早期アクセス版で試した。彼女の評価は「設計は非常に美しいが、結局使い続けられなかった」というものだ。
Claude Duet とは何か
Duet は iPhone や Android で動くパーソナルエージェントで、Claude と同期し、Claude が持つプラグインやコネクタをそのまま利用できる。Claire によれば、位置づけは中小企業オーナーや忙しい PM、CEO といった「中庸のビジネスユーザー」向けである。一般消費者向けでも、大量のエージェントを動かす開発者向けでもない。デスクトップの Cowork で頼むような作業を、スマホから頼む想定だという。
評価された設計の完成度
Claire は、Anthropic が設計の磨き込みで OpenAI の同種製品(番組中では「Dots」と聞こえる)を大きく上回っていると述べる。オンボーディングでは、何ができ、何にアクセスするのかが明確に示され、問題なく使い始められたという。
基本要素としては三つを挙げている。一つ目はタスクリストで、ユーザーとエージェントそれぞれが何を担当しているかを追える。二つ目はアーティファクトで、HTML、デザイン、スライドなどの成果物が第一級の扱いになり、既存の Claude アカウント上のものも読み込める。三つ目はチャンネルで、Slack に着想を得て、メインのチャットとは別に「sales」のような用途別の場を作れる。アイコンも「かわいく、攻撃的でない」と好意的だった。
使い続けられなかった理由
最大の問題は「プロアクティブなはずなのに、ほとんど働きかけてこない」ことだった。設定して数日、最初の数タスクを終えた後は一度も通知で呼び戻されなかったという。通知設定を忘れた可能性にも触れつつ、エレガントで控えめなことは美点でも、再エンゲージの観点では機能しないと指摘する。また、朝の3点ブリーフィングは他のエージェントでも飽きており、それ以外の再訪動機が必要だとの見方を示した。
二つ目は遅さである。Claire は Opus 5.5 のモデル自体は評価するものの、10分以上かかるスレッドがあり、チケット探しを頼んだ後は運転中に忘れてしまったと語る。応答の速い Muse や Codex の高速モデルと比べ、多少精度が低くても速い方を使いたくなると述べている。24時間即応する同僚というエージェントの利点が、遅延で損なわれるという主張だ。
実タスクでの結果と制約
メールと Slack の整理は「まずまず」だが、優先度や文脈の判断に難があったという。営業パイプラインは Slack、メール、CRM に接続済みでデータをすぐ引き出せた。Google ドキュメントで作ったセールスデッキは、Figma を使ってフォントなどのデザインを合わせてほしかったものの、悪くない出来で、デザインにこだわらない人なら満足するだろうとした。
一方、Claude で作っているローンチ動画は、Duet がローカルのスキルを取り込めず作れなかった。スキルをプラグイン化して Claude に載せる必要がありそうで、製品間でコンテキストがどう引き継がれるかは Anthropic だけでなく OpenAI にも共通する課題だと述べている。
さらにデスクトップ版がない点も大きい。日中は会議や作業で PC に向かうため、デスクトップに常駐して目に入るエージェント(Grok bot、Muse など)の方が使われやすいという。加えて、約5人の小さなチームで使う彼女にとって、エージェントをチームと共有できないシングルプレイヤー設計は、作業スタックに入らない理由になっている。
まとめ
Claire の結論は、美しいデザインや優れたモデル、アーティファクトだけでは注意を奪い合う市場では足りず、エージェントには速さ、プロアクティブさ、ループを閉じる信頼性が必要だというものだ。Duet はローンチ初期の他社製品より約100倍洗練されているとしつつ、仕上げの課題が残ると評価した。
日本の読者にとっての示唆は、エージェント製品の競争軸が機能やモデル性能から、継続利用を生む仕組み(通知、レイテンシ、デスクトップ連携、チーム共有)に移りつつある点だ。なお本回はあくまで一人の利用者による早期版の印象であり、研究プレビュー中の製品が今後改善される可能性も、本人が言及している。
文字起こし(英語・自動生成)
I have good news and I have bad news. The good news is Anthropic just released a new personal agent and it's really well designed. The bad news is I have personal agent fatigue. I am so tired of new personal agents and while this one is super, super well designed and I'll go through what I love about it, I just don't need another one. And so to compete for my attention, to compete for being my number one personal agent. You have to be not good, not great. You have to be exceptional. And we're going to see in today's episode if Claude Duet, their new personal agent, makes the cut. Let's get to it. Okay, before we go into my experience with Claude Duet, just a very, very quick walkthrough of what it is. It is a phone, iPhone, Android-based personal agent that is synced up with Claude and does all the things that personal agents do. So it is proactive, although I will go through how proactive it really is. It's proactive. It can use all the
tools and plugins that your Claude has access to. And they really position this as being a personal agent for small business owners or busy professionals. So none of this like your mom's going to use it with Muse and none of this like you have to be Lauren at Cursor who's going to run like 50,000 agents and ship a gajillion PRs. This is like solid middle of the road, business user, SMB, entrepreneur, busy PM, busy CEO, agent. The things that you would reach for in co-work on your desktop, maybe you'll start asking Claude Duet for. Now, you all know that I really love OpenAI products. I use Codex all day, every day. But I will say one thing that Anthropic did so, so, so well that OpenAI's dots did so, so, so poorly is the polish of the agent design. This app is beautiful. It is well-designed. There are no sharp edges. It is clearly incredibly
well thought through from a design perspective. Everything from the very, very early test flight versions that I got access to today has shown me that this is a exceptionally well polished product. From the second you onboard, they're really thoughtful about walking you through what Duet does, what it has access to, and how to get onboarded. It looks really nice. It feels really trusted. I had zero problems getting up and running out the gate. It was a really nice onboarding. It was a little similar to my experience with Muse, where it was very clear up front what it could do, very clear what it had access to, and then you got right into the product. The product itself has some primitives, again, like Muse, that I think you're going to really like. Of course, it has plugins and connectors, so it inherits all your plugins from Claude. So if you have your Gmail set up, your Google set up, your Figma set up, whatever, it's going to have access to those. It also has task lists, which is something I really liked from Muse's agent design.
I like the idea of keeping track of what goals and tasks I'm doing and what goals and tasks the agent's doing. So I think the task list view is something that's really nice here and something that we're going to come back to a lot. And then what it has that again, Muse has, but it does just a little bit more polished version of is artifacts. So if you're used to artifacts in Cloud Code or in Cowork, if you're generating HTML artifacts, designs, slides, Anthropic has made those first-class citizens in Duet so that whenever you're generating stuff in your little chat with your little Duet, it's going to create those artifacts. And it actually already can read the artifacts existing on your Cloud account. So when I showed up here and looked at my clod account it already had all those artifacts that I had generated over time in there and I had a really good sense of what I could do next Finally the last thing I really love about Duet is the idea of channels So we all trying to decide what the primitives of are for agents
In Codex, you have all these threads in chat. You have all these chats in Claude. You have threads and chats and projects, all sorts of things. In Muse, you have your main chat and side chats. Everybody's trying to figure this out. And Anthropic borrowed a little bit from Slack, which I feel like is everybody's favorite collaboration service, which positions these subchats, these subthreads, these like sub places that you're going to work in as channels. So now you can kind of think of your duet as a main thread, a main chat, but then you can break off other chats into channels and have specific channels. Like here, I created a sales channel for working on sales projects. And then I'll say my last little thing that I really like that I did give the Anthropic team props on is the icon. It's abstract. It's definitely Anthropic, quad-y. It's cute, but I have no problem with this little, dare I say it, dot. It's just adorable, not offensive, not weird. I like it. Yes, of course, I love my personalized Muse consumer agent, and that engenders a lot of joy with me.
Of course, I love my little grok bots and their little icons, but this is inoffensive, and I think it's just fine. And as somebody who cares about design, I thought it was pretty good. Now, what are some things that I did not like about Duet? Well, I will tell you, for a proactive agent, it just wasn't that proactive. I don't know if I forgot to turn on notifications or it's just not that annoying. But once I set up Duet a couple days ago and did a first couple tasks, It never pushed or bothered me to do anything ever again. It also doesn't show up in the desktop app, so it's a really disconnected experience. And so while I felt like the initial experience was pretty good, I ended up not going back to it, one, because I have a million other personal agents, and two, it really didn't pull me back in with useful things. I think one of the things that these agent designers are really going to have to grapple with is like there are only so many three-point morning briefings that can pull me back into a product. I get them from Dot all the time. They're not that exciting. I get them from Now Duet. They're
not that exciting. Like there's got to be something better than the morning briefing to engage agent users on why they would come back to the agent over time. And right now, I don't think any of these agents, except for maybe GrokBot and Muse, have really figured this out. So it's not as proactive as they want. The notifications aren't noisy enough for me to remember it. You know, I've said it's elegant and well-designed and subtle and not annoying, and those are all positives in some ways. But from a growth hacking perspective and the ability to get me to re-engage with your product, that doesn't work. I need you to be a little bit more annoying. I need you to be a little bit more proactive. I need you to be a little bit more noisy, or I'm truly going to forget you in the ecosystem of all my agents. So what were some things that I asked it to do and how well did it do it? Well, the first thing I asked it to do was just this like basic kind of like go through my email, go through my Slack, figure out what's going on. I would say it didn't do an exceptional job at that. It did okay. It came up with a couple things, but the priority didn't seem right. The context didn't see right. So I do think there's a little work on the quality
of the interaction. I asked it to find me good Warriors tickets, you know, go dubs. I want to go see the Warriors when they play the Pacers. It's a noon game. I can actually take my kids. And so I've had all my agents try to shop for tickets for me, shop for shoes for me. I thought this was a good eval. I had it go shop for me. And this is the second thing that I think is bad about it. So the first thing that I didn't love about Duet is that it is not that proactive. The second thing that I don't love about it, and this has been my experience with Claude generally, is it's slow, man And I get so disengaged waiting for the models to finish The killer feature of Muse Meta is that it is fast In fact Codex with their GPT Ultra Fast models it just keeps me engaged because I am always moving to the next step always getting something done And so even though I really love Opus 5.5 as a model, and even though it does really good work, the performance is so slow and you really feel that in a personal agent. And it degrades my desire to work
synchronously with an agent. You know, one of the benefits, I think, of an AI agent is that it is like a colleague, but a colleague who's up 24 hours a day and responds to you immediately. But if that colleague is slow, if that colleague goes to a meeting to get work done, like, you kind of forget and don't want to go to that colleague over your more responsive ones, even if the more responsive ones do, like, 10% worse of a job. And so it was shopping for these warrior tickets for me as I was, like, passenger princess and driving to dinner. And like, I kind of forgot that it did because it took so long. It didn't close the loop. And then by the time that I came back, I was off to something else. And so even though it tracked it in this, you know, checklist of things that it was doing, the performance was really frustrating. And I think this adds up, especially if you use a single chat, single agent where you're firing off a bunch of tasks, like you're saying, okay, check my email, and I need you to make a deck, and I need you to make edits on this thing, and let's figure out what we do for social. And in Claw Duet, those all kicked off individual
threads, but then they took so long. And I'm telling like 10 plus minutes to finish those threads or come back to me or ask for permissions. And because it wasn't noisy, because it wasn't, you know, like in my face, I actually forgot about all those threads. And so while like foundationally, it's really well designed. The models are very good. The intelligence is there. And like, I can't knock anything specific about the user experience. The reality is like the latency and the inability to close loops meant that this particular agent product just really fell to the bottom of my use list. I think the other thing that they're going to have to solve ASAP, and again, this is in research preview, so it's an early access list. It's in beta. I'm sure they will get there, is a desktop app. The reality is I do not want to be on my phone during the day
when I'm doing work and sitting on meetings. I need a desktop app to engage with my agents. I think that's why like RockBot does so well is there's a desktop agent. It's cute little icon is sitting there staring me in the face. I'm always chatting with it like it's Slack. Same with Muse. You know, I started using it as a mobile app, but very quickly download the desktop app. And that allows me to pull through all these tasks that maybe I kick off asynchronously on my phone and want to finish when I'm doing work at my computer. And then even same with dots from Codex, which I don't even use, but at least it's there. Like at least my dot bay is staring me at the face in Codex, like with a little notification saying like, do something here, get something done. And so what I would say about Duet is like it's got all the makings of a great agent except for the ability to drive urgency for me to engage with it. Maybe that's intentional. Maybe the design is to be calm and soothing and helpful but in the background.
But I do think to compete for attention right now, it is not enough to have beautiful design. It is not enough to have exceptional models. It is not enough to have these artifacts, which is actually really awesome and on the phone experience is quite zippy and felt really engaging. The agent itself has to be super proactive. The agent itself has to be super fast and it has to get stuff done quickly enough that you feel like you can close enough loops that it is a reliable coworker for you. Okay so that was a very long aside for buying more years tickets A couple other things that I had it do good bad left right You know standard I had it look at my sales pipeline Nice things there It was already connected to Slack. It was already connected to my email. It was already connected to our CRM. So it was able to pull in that data pretty quickly. I had it create a deck in Google Docs. I have a really high bar for design,
And so I was disappointed that it didn't use Figma and really match our design in terms of fonts and all that kind of stuff. But the deck wasn't bad. It was created in Google Docs, and it was kicked off from my phone. I think for, like, the kind of everyday business person who maybe is not as particular as me with design, they'd be really happy to create, like, little sales decks off a template, little documents, et cetera, on your phone on the go with Duet. so I think that was like good not great but I have a really high bar for that sort of thing and then one other point of like friction and disappointment again this is a me problem not a duet problem is I wanted to see if it can make a launch video for me I've been making all these launch videos in Claude I've been spending a whole bunch of time doing like chat PRD launch videos in Claude that look like this they're super cool um and I wanted to see if I could create those in duet on my phone. The reality is, unfortunately, Duet does not ingest all your local skills. So I probably need to push these skills as plugins to Claude and then it can have access. But again,
I think with all these product surface areas, and this is not just an anthropic problem, this is an open A problem, is like the shared context, the shared experience, what ports over elegantly, what does not port over elegantly, I think is going to be an open question for folks who want to really migrate to Claude Duet. I'd say the final thing that's really missing is, look, we don't work alone. And Duet right now is clearly a agent for single player use. In fact, like most of the Claude projects feel like very good products for single player use. I just don't think even with Claude Tag, Claude and Slack, all these things, I don't think they've quite cracked multiplayer. And I've been moving more of my GrokBot usage to team agents and deploying those in Slack. So while Claude Duet with these channels might feel like Slack, it doesn't have that multiplayer sharing aspect of Slack that has made me really effective, even as a small business owner, right? Like I'm not running a team of 500 anymore.
I do not need like the full enterprise deployment, but I am a small business owner. So I should be the target for this product. The problem is I have a small team. So, you know, I have like five humans that I work with on a regular basis. If I don't have a way to share my agents with them, I'm not sure if it's going to worm its way into my working sack. So that is my very quick preview, early review, early thoughts on Claude Duet, Anthropics' new personal agent. I would definitely give it a try. Again, I maybe have different use cases, different preferences, different desires than most people. I think it is approximately 100 times more polished than Dots was when it came out. So I think that's really nice. I think it is quite elegant. It does the job well. I would just say there's like fit and finish things that they really need to work on if they are going to compete for my agent business. So give it a try. Sign up for early access if you can.
Let me know what you think. And let me know if Claude Duet becomes part of your stack because I'm just not sure it's going to become part of mine. Thanks for joining How I AI. Thanks so much for watching. If you enjoyed this show, please like and subscribe here on YouTube, or even better, leave us a comment with your thoughts. You can also find this podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app. please consider leaving us a rating and review, which will help others find the show. You can see all our episodes and learn more about the show at howiaipod.com. See you next time.
番組の概要欄(原文)
<p>Anthropic's new personal agent, Claude Duet, lives on your phone, inherits all your Claude plugins and connectors, and is pitched at small business owners and busy professionals. It's the most polished agent launch I've seen: thoughtful onboarding, task lists, first-class artifacts, and Slack-style channels. But polish isn't enough when you're competing with every other personal agent for attention. I put it to work on my inbox and Slack, my sales pipeline, a Google Docs sales deck, a launch video, and finding Warriors tickets for my kids, and I'll walk you through what it nails, where it stalls, and what Anthropic needs to fix before it can become anyone's number one agent.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>What you’ll learn:</strong></p><ol><li>What Claude Duet is and who Anthropic built it for</li><li>The design details that make it far more polished than other personal agent launches</li><li>How task lists, artifacts, and channels work as agent primitives</li><li>Why a “proactive” agent that never nudges you is a growth problem</li><li>How model latency kills your willingness to work with an agent synchronously</li><li>Where it fell short on real tasks, from inbox triage to sales decks to launch videos</li><li>Why missing desktop and multiplayer support keeps it out of my working stack</li></ol><p>—</p><p><strong>In this episode, we cover:</strong></p><p>(00:00) Personal agent fatigue: does Claude Duet make the cut?</p><p>(00:40) What Claude Duet is and who it’s for</p><p>(01:39) Why the design polish stands out</p><p>(03:06) Task lists, artifacts, and channels</p><p>(04:53) The icon</p><p>(05:27) What I didn’t like: not proactive enough</p><p>(07:02) Testing it on email, Slack, and Warriors tickets</p><p>(07:41) Why latency matters so much in a personal agent</p><p>(10:20) The missing desktop app</p><p>(12:12) Sales pipeline and a Google Docs deck</p><p>(13:10) Launch videos and the local skills gap</p><p>(14:00) Single-player vs. multiplayer agents</p><p>(15:05) Final verdict</p><p>—</p><p><strong>Tools referenced:</strong></p><p>• Claude Duet (Anthropic): <a href="https://claude.com/resources/articles/claude-duet">https://claude.com/resources/articles/claude-duet</a></p><p>• Claude Duet Waitlist: <a href="https://claude.com/product/claude-duet">https://claude.com/product/claude-duet</a></p><p>• Claude Cowork: <a href="https://claude.com/product/cowork">https://claude.com/product/cowork</a></p><p>• Meta Muse: <a href="https://muse.ai/">https://muse.ai/</a></p><p>• Codex (OpenAI): <a href="https://openai.com/codex">https://openai.com/codex</a></p><p>• Grok Bot: <a href="https://x.ai/bot">https://x.ai/bot</a></p><p>—</p><p><strong>Where to find Claire Vo:</strong></p><p>ChatPRD: <a href="https://www.chatprd.ai/">https://www.chatprd.ai/</a></p><p>Website: <a href="https://clairevo.com/">https://clairevo.com/</a></p><p>LinkedIn: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/clairevo/">https://www.linkedin.com/in/clairevo/</a></p><p>X: <a href="https://x.com/clairevo">https://x.com/clairevo</a></p><p>—</p><p>Production and marketing by <a href="https://penname.co/">https://penname.co/</a>. For inquiries about sponsoring the podcast, email jordan@penname.co.</p>
出典・この記事について
- 番組
- How I AI(Claire Vo)
- 元の回
- Claude Duet is beautiful. I still forgot to use it
- 配信日
- 要約作成日
- 公式サイト
- podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/pen-name
この要約・解説記事は、元の音声を文字起こしした内容をもとに AI(Claude)が日本語で作成したものです。 固有名詞や数値に誤りを含む場合があるため、正確な内容は元の音声でご確認ください。制作方法について
関連エピソード

AIが「仕事」の意味を変える:金融リサーチ会社がサソリ毒の解毒タンパク質に挑んだ理由
The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis

Chamath「AGIはすでに到来した」—Anthropicの1000億ドル規模の拠出とElon MuskのSpaceX株贈与
Moonshots with Peter Diamandis

構造化データはなぜ取り残されたのか――グラフニューラルネットワークと Kumo のリレーショナル基盤モデル(Jure Leskovec 氏)
Making Data Simple

Fortune 2000のためのAI――Tenexが築くAIネイティブなSDLC(Alex Lieberman & CJ Hess)
Latent Space: The AI Engineer Podcast

AI企業が賭ける「知性より性格」――パーソナリティが競争軸になる理由
The AI Daily Brief: Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis

Google CEO サンダー・ピチャイ:AIの無限の可能性、計算資源の不足、そして次のAIプロダクト
Big Technology Podcast