A General Counsel's Playbook for Containing AI Litigation and Compliance Risks
This article discusses the growing legal and compliance challenges that general counsel face with the increasing use of AI systems in their organizations. It outlines key strategies to manage AI-related risks, including classifying use cases, demanding traceability, tightening vendor contracts, and embedding AI into governance frameworks.
Why it matters
As AI systems become more pervasive in enterprises, general counsel must develop a comprehensive strategy to mitigate the growing legal and compliance risks.
Key Points
- 1Existing regulations, not new AI-specific laws, are being applied to AI systems by financial, data protection, and consumer protection regulators
- 2AI systems can expose organizations to familiar legal claims like fraud, misrepresentation, and unfair practices, with the added complexity of opaque models and vendor-run decision engines
- 3General counsel must make AI systems 'legible' by classifying use cases, demanding traceability, tightening vendor contracts, and embedding AI into three-lines-of-defense governance
- 4AI-powered tools for M&A and litigation support can accelerate work but also introduce new risks, such as hallucinated citations leading to sanctions
Details
General counsel are now accountable for AI systems they did not directly purchase or fully understand, but must defend under overlapping regulatory regimes in the EU, UK, and US. Existing laws around fraud, misrepresentation, and unfair practices are being applied to AI systems, even as vendors embed opaque language models and agent-based decision engines into core workflows with limited documentation and auditability. To manage this 'infinite' AI risk, general counsel must take a proactive approach: classifying AI use cases by risk level, demanding robust traceability and security controls, tightening vendor contracts, and embedding AI systems into three-lines-of-defense governance frameworks (business ownership, independent risk/compliance oversight, and internal audit testing). The goal is to turn amorphous AI risk into a documented, explainable program that can withstand legal discovery, regulatory review, and expert scrutiny.
No comments yet
Be the first to comment