Are You a Luddite?
The article discusses the emergence of AI-generated content, often referred to as 'slop' or 'shit', and how it is similar to historical technological disruptions like the horse manure crisis in 1894 London. It acknowledges the legitimate grievances of artists and creators whose work has been used to train AI models without permission, but argues that the technology cannot be uninvented and must be used responsibly.
Why it matters
This article provides a balanced perspective on the ongoing debate around AI-generated content, acknowledging the valid concerns of creators while also recognizing the inevitability of the technology and the need to focus on responsible use and quality of output.
Key Points
- 1The article compares the current debate around AI-generated content to historical technological disruptions like the horse manure crisis and the decline of the whaling industry.
- 2It acknowledges the valid concerns of artists and creators whose work has been used to train AI models without their consent.
- 3However, the article argues that the technology cannot be uninvented and that the focus should be on using it responsibly and advocating for fairer systems.
- 4It suggests that the 'AI Aversion' phenomenon is a psychological barrier not based on the quality of the output, but on the knowledge of the source.
- 5The article suggests that the average human output is often mediocre, and that the quality of the content, not the source, should be the focus.
Details
The article draws parallels between the current debate around AI-generated content and historical technological disruptions, such as the horse manure crisis in 1894 London and the decline of the whaling industry. It acknowledges the legitimate grievances of artists and creators whose work has been used to train AI models without their permission, compensation, or credit. However, the article argues that the technology cannot be uninvented, and that the focus should be on using it responsibly, advocating for fairer systems, and focusing on the quality of the output rather than the source. The article suggests that the 'AI Aversion' phenomenon is a psychological barrier not based on the quality of the output, but on the knowledge of the source. It also suggests that the average human output is often mediocre, and that the quality of the content, not the source, should be the focus.
No comments yet
Be the first to comment