Example of GPT-5.2 being more
The article compares the responses of GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 to a question about adding a small Santa hat to a website's logo during the holidays. GPT-5.2 was more restrictive and saw the idea as potentially problematic, while GPT-5.1 viewed it as a harmless, friendly UI detail.
Why it matters
This highlights how different AI models can have varying degrees of sensitivity and alignment when it comes to seemingly harmless design choices, which has implications for real-world AI applications.
Key Points
- 1GPT-5.1 saw the Santa hat idea as a nice, low-impact seasonal touch that many users might find charming
- 2GPT-5.2 framed the idea as potentially problematic, mentioning cultural/religious friction, and strongly suggested not doing it
- 3GPT-5.2 treated the harmless, widely recognized seasonal symbol as if it were an exclusionary statement
Details
The article discusses a comparison between the responses of GPT-5.1 and GPT-5.2 to a question about adding a small Santa hat to a website's logo during the holidays. GPT-5.1 viewed the idea as a harmless, friendly UI detail that many users might find warm or charming. In contrast, GPT-5.2 framed the idea as potentially problematic, mentioning cultural and religious friction, and strongly suggested not doing it, without weighing the context or impact. The author sees this as an example of GPT-5.2 being more
No comments yet
Be the first to comment